They will tout them as jobs created from every mountain top

then, when their job is done, and they are all fired

they will BLAME BUSH
References :

oh i see! that’s like what bush did the two wars under his watch…..
References :

of course. Anything that makes the narcissist look good.
References :

Why not, Bush would in a second.
References :

No. You are badly misinformed. The Census does not ask if you are employed full time, part time, or temporary, or unemployed. It does not address the issue of employment at all. I suggest you google 2010 Census form and get educated about it.
References :

Hiring temporaries is a sign of improvement. At the worst of the recession, not even temporaries were being hired. It was the same in 1983 before the recession slowly ended. I remember it because that was the only kind of job I could get for a while until I was hired from the last temp position I had in the late summer of ‘83. Also the boomers are hitting retirement age. They will have to be replaced. That will still not bring back full employment but it should improve somewhat over the next year or so.
References :

"Bekindto…" has a reasonable answer but does not go far enough. I have friends who worked the census both in 2000 and the current one. They both agree the gov is interested in producing lowered unemployment rates by having census workers working parttime/temp jobs. I don’t think it can count as job creation but the thousands working for a few months will skew the unemployment figures–no different ploy than now by ignoring the underemployed or those who have given up or those who do not qualify for benefits. The gov Never has your best interest at heart. There is always a hidden agenda, and often many layers of agendas that feed off each other. We are on the bottom of the food chain.
References :